Document Type : marine engineering


1 Center of Excellence in Energy Conversion and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Aerospace Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran


To indicate the best airfoil profile for different sections of a blade, five airfoils; included S8xx, FFA and AH series was studied. Among the most popular wind power blades for this application were selected, in order to find the optimum performance. Nowadays, modern wind turbines are using blades with multi airfoils at different sections. SST-K-ω model with different wind speed at large scale profile applied to simulation of horizontal axis wind turbines (HAWT). The aerodynamic simulation was accomplished using Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) method based on the finite volume method. The governing equations apply in this simulation are the Unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navies Stocks (URANS) equations. The aerodynamic coefficients of lift and drag were calculated at different angles of attack and different wind speeds. The results are validated by Eppler code, Xfoil and experimental data of the U.S National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The results show that S818 profile is the best profile in terms of gaining the highest lift coefficient with the lowest angel of attack at the root of the blades. The results also indicated that the selected model can predicted the exact geometry with a high precision.


Ackermann, T., (2005). Wind power in power systems. Sweden,Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.
Adam, M.; Ragheb, M.S.S., (2011). MultiElementAirfoilsWindTurbines. AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.
ANSYS, (2014). ANSYS FLUENT User Guide. ANSYS, Inc. Southpointe 275 Technology Drive Canonsburg, PA 15317: U.S.A.
Björk, A., (1996). A Guide to Data Files From Wind Tunnel Test Of A NACA 63-215 Airfoil at FFA.
Borg, M.; Shires, A.; Collu, M., (2014). Offshore floating vertical axis wind turbines, dynamics modelling state of the art. part I: Aerodynamics, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39 (0).
Farrugia, R.; Sant, T.; Micallef, D., (2014). Investigating the aerodynamic performance of a model offshore floating wind turbine. Renewable Energy. 70(0), 24-30.
Gatski, T.B., (2009). Compressibility, Turbulence and High Speed Flow. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Gonzalez A., (2007). Three dimensional and Rotational Aerodynamics on the NREL Phase VI Wind Turbine Blade. 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV.
Hirsch, C., (1990). Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. 2, John Wiley & Sons.
Manwell, J., (2012). Offshore Wind Energy offshore wind energy Technology Trends, Challenges, and Risks, in Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology. R. Meyers Editor, Springer New York. 7393-7425.
Mark, P.; Dimitri, M., (2009). Unstructured Mesh CFD Aerodynamic Analysis of the NREL Phase VI Rotor. 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Orlando, Florida.
McGowan, J.F.M., (2009). Wind Energy Explained Theory Design and Application. 2nd Ed ed, Wiley.
Mukesh Marutrao Yelmule, E.A.V., (2013). CFD predictions of NREL Phase VI Rotor Experiments in NASA/AMES Wind tunnel. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research-IJRER, 3 (2).
Pape, A.L.; Lecanu, J., (2004). 3D Navier–Stokes computations of a stall-regulated wind turbine. Wind Energy, 7(4), 309-324.
Sayed, M.A.; Kandil, H.A.; Shaltot, A., (2012). Aerodynamic analysis of different wind-turbine-blade profiles using finite-volume method. Energy Conversion and Management, 64(0), 541-550.
Sayed, M. A., (2011). Unsteady aerodynamic simulation of horizontal axis wind turbine blade. World wind energy conference, Cairo, Egypt.
Sayed, M. A., (2011). Morgan Computational fluid dynamics study of wind turbine blade profiles at low reynolds' number for various angles of attack. 4th international meeting on advances in thermofluids, Melaka, Malaysia.
Tangler, J. L., (1982). Comparison of Wind Turbine Performance Prediction and Measurement. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 104(2), 84-88.
Van Rooij, R. P. J. O. M.; Timmer, W. A., (2003). Roughness Sensitivity Considerations for Thick Rotor Blade Airfoils. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 125(4), 468-478.
Wilcox, D. C., (2006). Turbulence Modeling for CFD. Canada.
Zonal, F. R., (1993). Two equation k –ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper, 93-2906.